Six sigma = 3.4 dppm

Quote from my classmate Gary’s post

“Well, this magic number came from the assumption of normal distibution, that most occurances will be in the middle of the range and then spreads off in a bell-shape on the chart, and Sigma is the SD of such.

So by definition 99.99999980268% of total value would lie within Mean +/- 6 x Sigma. Then, one obvious follow-up question would be why 3.4 instead of 0.002, following that logic. For this, let me quote from the literature,

“The difference occurs because Motorola presumes that the process mean can drift 1.5 sigma in either direction. The area of a normal distribution beyond 4.5 sigma from the mean is indeed 3.4 parts per million. Because control charts will easily detect any process shift of this magnitude in a single sample, the 3.4 parts per million represents a very conservative upper bound on the nonconformance rate."

So it’s still based on the fundamental assumption of normal distribution, with a little twist. Hope this helps tame your curiousity."

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com 標誌

您的留言將使用 WordPress.com 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Google+ photo

您的留言將使用 Google+ 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Twitter picture

您的留言將使用 Twitter 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

Facebook照片

您的留言將使用 Facebook 帳號。 登出 /  變更 )

連結到 %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.